RIP JACK LARSON MY DEAR FRIEND! Little did you know that it would be you next on their list! You stood by me buddy when we went through our ordeal! I'll stand by you now that you have been silenced!

Jack Larson was our friend and supporter of www.prevenmurder.org. Never in my wildest dreams, did I think Jack, who lives a few houses down, would be the next victim murdered by an El Dorado County maniac wielding a gun in violation of gun carry laws. Jack didn't think it was good cricket that we were retaliated by the same people who mistreated his wife at his murder scene! I can't say Unbelievable, because it was expected! We just didn't know lightning would strike so close in the same place! We are in shock and fear, mainly of officials who are so arrogant and stubborn, that they refuse to change an illegal policy in conflict with the Constitution of the United States and California.

El Dorado County Officials Sponsored the murder of these victims by "ratifying violence with inaction." CLICK

Understanding El Dorado County and Abuse of Discretion

Federal Law Suit Obscene Opinion contrary to the constitution recommended in our civil right case.

El Dorado County Judge James Wagoner punished by CJP, but other officials "getting away" with obstruction of justice in a deceptive smear campaign against crime victims of a criminally defendant who arranged a political favor. El Dorado County Crime victims are punished for reporting crime! Be Warned! CLICK HERE

ARE CITIZENS WHO FILE THEIR OWN LAWSUITS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST UNDER “CLASS OF ONE” BY U.S. COURTS WHO HAVE STACKED THE DECKS AGAINST CIVIL RIGHTS CASES?

Amazingly, I filed my lawsuit and have realized that the magistrate judge counterfeited our cause of actions, by “Fundamentally Misconstruing” the claim from our “colorful claim” to a non actionable claim, benefiting the defense, non other than, “fellow government officials.”  This bias and conflict of interest that exists in civil right claims is deplorable.  Yet our job as citizens caught up in this deceptive abuse is to make these officials go on record, “deliberately choosing to violate U.S. Citizen Rights, so that future cases can refer to this type of judicial misconduct.  They may not be held liable in civil litigation, but these acts are criminal acts of fraud raising to the level or organized crime in our Judiciary.  They can be held liable as these judges are now facing. CLICK  Nevertheless, I motioned the court to notice that this Magistrate Brennan violated federal statute by not gaining consent.  Also that he had counterfeited my claim.  I started wondering if this was common.  A few days later, a reader of this site emailed me a link describing, what is now common knowledge of, judicial abuse and discrimination against non wealthy disfavored citizens who are attempting to stop official abuse under the color of law.  Read it!  You will not believe it!

Disparate Treatment of Pro Se Civil Litigants in Federal Court: A Justification for Resort to Inappropriate Self-Help?

The term “prevent murder” to some suggests an interfering negative stigma, sometime invoking a knee jerk reaction by the uninformed observer.  Those who have reasonable mental capacity will be able to discern the real purpose of utilizing that phrase.  Our definition of “Prevent Murder” in this site means; activism by media invoking “public scrutiny of official conduct ”1 in the hope that  when officials abuse power under the false color of official right, continued abuse will be deterred." Officials rely on electorate support!  Main stream media has acquiesced to concealing from the public; official corruption that affects citizens who have been “disfavored” when they exercise their civil rights.  It is the hope that our constitution still has the power to protect media like www.preventmurder.org so that they can deter overt corruption committed by officials who abuse and enjoy ill gotten gain and obstruction of justice benefits of immunity. 2 This public scrutiny exposing ignorant careless officials is intended to change unlawful policy 3 that prevents a human to enjoy “life, liberty, or the pursuit of Happiness” at the hands of government deliberate indifference, malice, and gross negligence. There has been criticism of our use of this term "prevent murder," as a title on correspondence addressing issues that are describing the “course of conduct” of public officials in El Dorado County where this focus study has originated.  Pat Hamer, a real estate developer, scholar, and political activist has devoted the last several years to assist murder victims beyond the grave, who have been silenced by violent crime while officials in El Dorado County had some form of negligent control over the murderers who killed them.  Prevent Murder.org, began in El Dorado County! History will reveal this and enforce the notoriety of the the following officials who took part in the deliberate civil rights abuses against El Dorado County crime victims Pat and Donna Hamer. While there are other victims, we will protect them from retaliation by not naming them.

What eventually transpired was Helen Baumann’s office “under her direction,” was caught by Bob Berger of the Sacramento Republican Party committee committing wire fraud.  Senator Dave Cox also provided the exact same evidence to assist in our federal complaint, Exhibit A1 in Federal Court.  Shockingly, when Pat Hamer contacted Assemblyman Ted Gaines, his office had Detectives, in concert with Jeff Neves, El Dorado county sheriff deputies numbering about 8 to 10 officers converge on Pat and Donna’s residence,  The raid was terrifying!  Pat, while entertaining guests, asked the detectives what he did wrong.  They stated, “nothing but you have no more right to contact officials, and if you do, we will be back!”  They had no warrant, no probable cause, but they had power under the color of authority to intimidate and violate the rights of Crime Victims, by engaging in racketeering activity, in the light of Proposition 9.  If you don’t see what is wrong with this, our country is in trouble in deed.  When officials resort to protecting criminals and harming crime victims, and there is no recourse, nobody is safe!

Judge Englund, Eastern District court Sacramento recently set this as precedent by dismissing the case against Ted Gaines, without viewing any genuine issues of material fact, and violating the 9th circuit controlling precedent Kaahumanu v. City of Maui.  This proves that even Judges in Federal Court will ignore law and motion precedence to protect fellow powerful officials.  He is allowing the suit to continue against El Dorado County, but because he isn't’t afraid to ignore case law and precedence, it’s like playing monopoly with your older cousin and you know he cheats!  Not a very profitable endeavor, but the outcome must be determined and the abuses will be recorded!  A very scary predicament for a crime victim who dialed 911 to report a crime 4 years ago!  Think about this!  Is our Constitutional rights worth exercising? If not, what good are they? That is the question here, and the answer will be known in the outcome.

PRESS RELEASE 3-17-2010

Pat and Donna Hamer discovered that El Dorado County was negligent in cases where murders occurred; even though they were preventable! They discovered this when they became publicly vocal when El Dorado County and State Legislator Ted Gaines retaliated against them when they exercised a First amendment right to speak out against corruption! This speech and redress was thought to be reasonable, when they and their witnesses were threatened with murder! Law enforcement turned a blind eye seemingly hoping that if they were murdered, this would silence them! It may sound bizarre but a murder actually occurred in in Fiddletown, a few miles away, by a similar crime victim, John O'Sullivan whose cries for help went unheard and he was murdered and can speak no more! It is not unreasonable to seek help from law enforcement! It is unreasonable that, law enforcement had "animus" or motive to hope that Pat and Donna Hamer's testimony would be barred by any means including their murder, and this is what has been occurring for the fourth year even though they have a restraining order to protect them. The Hamer's allege that they have been disfavored for discovering corruption in the regional Republican Party, and and their evidence show that some of these officials are guilty of "influence peddling" which is artifice designed to deny them Fourteenth Amendment Protection to adequate Fair and Impartial government services!

These facts led to the conception of www.preventmurder.org! We hope that it will eventually protect others, as this type of corruption is prevalent throughout California! El Dorado County is one of the few, who protect corrupt officials over the rights of crime victims! [see Mike Carona, Orange County]. The current Board of Supervisors are aware, but choose to "remain silent," according to policy, as stated by Jack Sweeney a Board of Supervisor.

These facts led to the conception of www.preventmurder.org! We hope that it will eventually protect others, as this type of corruption is prevalent throughout California! El Dorado County has been caught red handed protecting corrupt officials over the rights of crime victims! [see Mike Carona, Orange County]. The current Board of Supervisors are aware, but choose to "remain silent," according to policy, as stated by Jack Sweeney a Board of Supervisor.

Pat and Donna Hamer became crime victims on November 22, 2006 when a mentally ill criminal defendant [name withheld due to murder threats] in El Dorado County, while this menace to society was released on a 1/4 million dollar bail bond, who shot their truck and dogs and was arrested, but again was charged for another felony crime made into a misdemeanor. He was ironically immediately released to commit assaults under the eye of law enforcement and was allowed to make murder threats on his witnesses and victims, apparently to intimidate them to get them to drop charges. Officials would do nothing. Eventually the Hamer's never again heard about the charges against this menace, as these charges magically disappeared! The property damage, not including the animal abuse was $5000.00. El Dorado County under a New D.A. Vern Pierson, reversed the voted out D.A. Gary Lacy policy of apprehending these suspects. However, the newly elected D.A. Vern Pierson was caught supervising "fixing of felonies" and named as "appropriate actions" in a letter by BOS office Helen Baumann, in protecting crimes committed by this perpetrator. Witnesses provide affidavits that the defendant, who publicly campaigned for Pierson stated "that Pierson is a friend who would fix his felonies" [words to that effect]. Pat and Donna Hamer were then threatened with murder along with their witnesses and other neighbors who have been barred from testifying by corrupt courts in El Dorado County, exception of several judges who issued 5 restraining orders against the defendant to protect witness and victims, under Gary Lacy who was obeying law. The Hamer's were told by Judge James Wagoner that he would "have them arrested and fined" if they testified! But when under Pierson, he would no longer enforce the orders without any lawful rational basis! The Hamer's and other crime victims were denied equal protection under the constitution, an unlawful act due to retaliation by officials to punish Pat and Donna Hamer for exposing their corruption which has resulted in public disgrace of Helen Baumann, Jeff Neves, and James Wagoner, and others! Their businesses was attacked by official actions and inactions in disobedience to restraining orders, and they lost the use of their business property! Unbelievably, Deputy Dan Johnson told them "they had no right to conduct business on their business property," which is stated in police reports. Sheriff and D.A. Pierson ratified this policy that cannot be hid! But they say "trust us, it never happened" and other officials ignore the documents and continue abusing Pat and Donna Hamer and other victims!

Whistle blowing by private citizens is supposed to be protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. Because the above officials controlled the means to protect citizens, they were able to block typical redress, even though they eventually resulted in the political demise of board of Supervisor Helen Baumann; Furthermore, the counsel on judicial performance ruled on the Hamer's complaint against Judge James Wagoner, and the counsel found him guilty of wrong doing and took a "corrective action" based upon the complaint that Wagoner held a Mock Trial. This was only one of four separate trials against this mentally ill menace to society. Judge Wagoner abused his power and influenced a jury by illegal action to acquit this defendant. This fake acquittal made it look like he was being falsely accused by 7 witnesses against his unsubstantiated testimony that the judge ordered the jury to believe, an illogical and illegal act of a Superior Court Judge, according to Robin Seeley of the Judicial Counsel in control of jury instructions! Yet there were 3 other criminal trials that Vern Pierson, in violation of the California Constitution Article 1 Section 28, the crime victim bill of rights, barred the people of California from protecting citizens from further violent crimes and potential deadly force by mentally ill patients allowed to commit violent crime for no rational reason.

Because Pat and Donna Hamer contacted their representatives, Helen Baumann, Jeff Neves, Vern Pierson, Senator Dave Cox, Assemblymen Ted Gaines, these representatives who are Republican Party members, ganged up on Pat and Donna Hamer and violated their civil rights to conceal Republican Party involvement, which is inarguable! Senator Dave Cox, bless his heart, did not participate, and provided the policy letter as evidence called exhibit A1, ignored by the federal courts and defense thus far! This exhibit A1 explains how each party member should lie about Pat and Donna to conceal their original negligence and abuse by discrediting the Hamer's. The Defense Attorney Franklen Gumpart states, "so what, even if true they are immune." But he does not understand abrogation of immunity for Monell liablility and offers no valid defense.

This case filed in Eastern District Court in Sacramento, can expose corruption where officials even in federal courts protect each other and exposing this is to the benefit of society. The case is Prima Facie and inarguable, but you would not think so if you believe the defense and Magistrates skewed perception, who has been deploying smoke and mirrors by arguing against allegations they made up and that are not alleged by the Hamer's. Anybody with college level education who understands the Greek philosophers would recognize the defense argument to be "ad homenim abusive." Our case is inarguable, and the fact they create another counterfeit claim to argue against proves this. We win because we were wronged in the way the court defines official abuse under the color of authority! If only they would not commit fraud by re alleging our complaint so that it would be dismissed!

Can they get away with this? that is the proverbial question that will be answered!

This case has developed into overt sinister on goings in our government.  What the Hamer's have discovered as a plaintiff, self represented, or more accurately what they consider a derogatory term, “Pro Se,” is that the courts are funneling these cases to what are called Magistrate Judges. Pro Se has been stigmatized to treat non wealthy litigants as they were mentally unbalanced disfavored citizens who have no case but file frivolous complaints for the fun of it.  Magistrate Judges are non article III judges.  As citizens, it would be “unconstitutional” to not allow Article III judges to preside in suits or criminal cases, according to 28 USC section 636.  Magistrates have to get consent from parties.  Yet the Hamer's did not know this even after 2 years, because Magistrate Brennan withheld consent, and barred them from electronic filing, which could have informed them as they were not served any notice by mail.  The Hamer's discovered this when this magistrate issued a “findings and recommendation” instead of a typical “order” of the court.  He violated article 28 USC 636.  Because of this, the courts do have a safety mechanism to protect parties against magistrates who abuse this, and because of this, they have moved their case to the appellate court using 28 USC 636(c)(3), temporarily halting this unconstitutional deprivation of rights, in a place where they should be protected casting the federal courts in a light that is malicious toward civil rights litigants who represent themselves due to economic restraints.

There is a similar case under Magistrate Brennan, who is the Hamer's unauthorized non article III Judge, where another plaintiff, John O’Sullivan was murdered by his neighbor, an ex sheriff.  The Hamer's have just discovered this. The attached news article describes similarities. O'Sullivan was born in Ireland, Pat Hamer was born in the United Kingdom. The Hamer's don’t know if that has any, national origin, discrimination, but at this point they wouldn't totally discount it. But they are under the threat of murder, as is ½ a dozen other witnesses and victims by this mentally ill friend of El Dorado County public officials .  They have restraining orders but El Dorado County has disfavored them and they will not enforce the orders and they will not provide a “rational basis” to allow felonies against them that could result in their murders.  The Hamer's motioned the Federal Court for an injunction to protect them because the state restraining orders would not be enforced.  A magistrate judge is not allowed to hear injunctions, according to local rules and 28 636.  They did not know this and Magistrate Brennan illegally denied their injunction, and he was the same judge handling the civil case of the now murdered “John O’Sullivan.   This does not look good for the Hamer's when a Judge knowingly allows murder threats in the same time frame one of his plaintiffs has been murdered! What is the rationale? The Hamer's are in the high courts of federal jurisdiction, and the court is acquiescing to the unlawful policy they are suing the county for.  They ask for protection so they do not end up like O'Sullivan! Yet the courts rule that if they are murdered so what! They do not care or have an obligation to protect them even knowing it is a possibility by similar circumstances of murder victim John O'Sullivan! What can They do?  Seek political asylum to Russia to find protection for civil right abuse?  Give me a break!  Is this not news? 

To educate you on civil rights in the 21st century, you must be able to prove “animus” in order to have standing in a 42 USC 1983 action.  Under “class of one” discrimination, all citizens can bring a suit but must show an “animus” or reason they discriminated against you where others were treated different without a “rational basis” for their personal discrimination.  You do not have to be a “protected class.”  [See SCOTUS Willowbrook v. Olec, or Enquist]  Yet these defendants have provided elements of "racketeering" activity. Wire and Mail Fraud, Conspiracy, and interference with interstate commerce of the Hamer's.

The Hamer's explain that:

The Animus against us by officials developed when we exposed a board of Supervisor committing wire fraud, which under 18 USC 1343, leading to the deprivation of “intangible honest government services, 18 USC 1346.  Helen Baumann was discovered by the Sacramento Republican Party member Bob Berger, and we have the document that proves this.  Senator Dave Cox was recruited, though unsuccessfully, in this conspiracy to cover up our allegations.  He provided, as “evidence” the fraudulent document called Exhibit A1.  Exhibit A2 is the confession and the blaming of Co Defendant Jeff Neves Sheriff, as the king pin along with his Under sheriff, Fred Kollar along with Dick Jones and Vern Pierson of the D.A. office!  They were hiding their negligence allowing mental patients to be armed. At that point they truly were immune. It was the "deliberate choice among various others" to continue the cover up of their wrong doing! This creates malice and our system allows for treble damages to punish officials and deter future acts by other officials! Our allegations are, El Dorado county officials were allowing mentally ill criminal defendants free reign to terrorize crime victims.  We had examples of ½ a dozen murders that were preventable when county officials followed unlawful policy.  Our case was overtly showing that of cronyism; where officials were influence peddling the fixing a felony.  Our facts and evidence eventually got Judge James Wagoner admonished by the CJP Counsel on Judicial Performance.  We have a letter from them dated June 30th 2009 signed by Cynthia Dorffman explaining that they “took a corrective action” against the judge.  For revealing these facts, officials showed an unlawful “animus” to deprive our rights so we would appear to be non credible.   I heard it said, in the movie “Usual Suspects,” “the most prolific strategy by Satan was that he convinced the world that he did not exist!”  Not to get religious or stand on theatrical prose, but it is the best analogy to describe what they are doing with our facts!  Officials hold the power to convince the electorate that they are providing due process by allowing Mock Trials that are fixed.  These events of “mock trials” were objected to by the early colonist in 1772 Declaration of Independence.  My claim is not a delusional conspiracy, but a matter of fact, backed by a collection of “genuine issues of material fact.” Yet not one of them is mentioned in the motions to dismiss! If they do mention, then they have to determine if they are genuine! This would sink their defense of immunity. What is sad and sickening is the Magistrate, is also ignoring our "issues of genuine facts," to the benefit of the defense!  Yet if you read the findings, they reflect or pleadings in the light of “imaginary ramblings that are not discernable.” Yet magistrate Brennan does fabricate a false story that is very discernable to the benefit of fellow government officials!  This is contrary to “construing of pleadings in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs!” [see Fontana v. Haskins 9th circ., and others]  The Magistrate Brennan has provided proof by example that he is fraudulently hiding from public record our claims, and actually has counterfeited our allegations to resemble allegations we do not allege. Basically Magistrate Judge Brennan is committing perjury! We can state this publicly because it is true. Our pleading and motions prove this, that he is deliberately ignoring our objections!According to law and Supreme court, he cannot be held liable civilly, and it is unlikely that law enforcement in this region will indict him! Indicting Judges ruins the careers of bungling bureaucrats trying to climb the ladders in our corrupt system! It's time to stop looking at other countries we consider corrupt and focus on our own for change! This change will never occur while the 11th amendment protects corrupt officials!  These are bold statements I can back up and they have no defense other than, oops!  Magistrate Brennan is forwarding his counterfeited fraudulent findings to a real Judge, Judge Englund, as if they were our claims in order to conceal the existence of our substantial meritorious claims that he hides stating they are "rambling." But he has no problem stating them as benefiting the defense!  On appeal, we figure they will also just believe what is presented without consideration of our claim, which is hid! This should alarm citizens! Most citizens will never be caught up in influence peddling that favors corruption of the rights of innocent crime victims! But if it does, and you did nothing to speak against what is happening to us, then you deserve the injustice that we are not deserving of because we spoke out not just for us, but the others involved to afraid, and with good reason to remain silent in a country that boast the right of free speech! Balderdash! Our soldiers who die in battle defend the right of officials to be corrupt, and they do not know this! These officials mix these soldiers blood in cocktails and are drunk with ill gotten power! This should not be!

OTHER FACTS STATED:

We also exposed Helen Baumann BOS D2 of El Dorado county to her party and this ended her career with them, we have the document showing this.  She was arrested a few months later in bizarre hit and run drunk driving reacting to life’s consequences due to the disregard for ethics and human rights of others. 

I have a letter from the Republican Party Committee member who stated his involvement in exposing these candidates would “ruin his career.”  The Republican party is covering this up because it is a regional problem that the whole damn party ratified the bad conduct of their elected officials.  Jeff Neves the elected sheriff has stepped down, and he is a defendant in our suit. 

What is interesting, but sad to the concept of civil rights, or better stated, human rights, of Americans, is that the federal courts are aiding in covering up corruption that is complained about by “disfavored” citizens.  That is what we have become!  Disfavored citizens are denied equal protection of law as retaliation for free speech and redress of the First Amendment that causes an official to be held accountable, or to “cover up” their unlawful acts. We are the new whipping boys of the smug elite that have abandoned the KKK or other supremacist theoretical groups.  It is not about skin color abuse it is about human right abuse. 

Our claim is that we were deprived of “equal protection clause of the constitution” for “fair and impartial services” from our government.  This is constitutionally protected and if you can prove this as a policy designed to discriminate against citizens who expose corruption or negligence [whistle blowers] you will win in court so that official can be punished and stigmatized in order that they will not be elected to repeat the offenses, according to “Bogan v. Scott Harris.” Also  [see Rayford v. Omura; Kaahumanu v. Maui; Willowbrook v. Olec and many others as I just quoted the 9th circuit courts]

What the good Magistrate did, beside conceal his lack of authority, was to “fundamentally misconstrue” our pleadings.   Better stated, he attempt to convince the real article III Judge, Judge Englund, by counterfeiting our pleadings to a cause of action that we did not allege, ie “failure to act.”   We have objected time and again but they simply do not read out motions.  They have ignored precedence and our claim, simply restated to benefit the defense, whereby creating a Mock trial without a jury to dismiss our claims as implausible.  So far they haven’t’ fulfilled this and dismissed us.  But because we have no ear to complain to, even though we paid the fee in Federal Court, they are creating the scenario that we have been heard.  In the Magistrates findings, he states in his own words, misconstruing a case that affects the free speech of State Employees, not private citizens. Magistrate Brennan, is telling the Judge that we are “state employees, not protected by the constitution.”  The last time I worked for the Government was the U.S. Navy over 30 years ago!  How can they get away with this?  I have that answer!  The press or media allows it to happen!

Magistrate Brennan states, “Pat and Donna Hamer, do not have a constitutional right to be heard.” [PULL QUOTE]

Of course, very few citizens would believe this could happen!  The stigma that follows civil right complaints where officials deprive you of rights, us typically, “oh there must be some rational explanation!”  I would sure like to know what it is, and you are supposed to get it in the courts by a Jury and this court is doing everything to bar a jury trial!  Only a few percent actually attempt to sue the government when they have been wronged because lawyers will not touch these cases!  So who cares?    

Several days after objecting and attempting to get Judicial Notice, we were given this web site designed and well laid out by a law student who is making this cause his thesis obviously.  This site, http://www.knowyourcourts.com/Archives/Pro_Se_Illusion/Pro_Se_Illusion.htm came after the fact that I made my own analysis of what was being perpetrated by the federal courts against us.  It was perfectly in unison with this information provided on the site.  I realized that they were ignoring our valid claim and replacing it with “failure to act” allegations, that are similar, to our claims.  “Failure to act” is not actionable due to cases like Gonzales v. Castle Rock where citizens “do not have a constitutional right to have restraining orders enforced, even if the murder victims are babies!” That case states, “restraining orders are not designed to [restrain]!” UNQUTOE! We site other cases, Estate of Maria Teresa Macias v. Mark Ihde 219 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2000) and as recent as this year Elliot-Park v. Manglona 9th cir. 2010 which states that citizens cannot be disfavored and denied equal protection.  That is our claim.  Also we are alleging what is called Monell Liability which abrogates immunity of Municipal officers, and we have a prima facie inarguable case.  Furthermore, even legislator Ted Gaines has abrogated 11th amendment immunity, which is very rare, according to Bogan v. Scott Harris U.S. S. CT. and Kaahumanu v. City of Maui 9th circ.!  Judge James Wagoner threatened to arrest us for filing a Grand Jury Complaint that alleges a case he was handling was being fixed!  We did not know he was handling the case.  Our allegations was for obstruction of justice and witness tampering before we knew he was assigned the case!  He stopped a grand jury investigation even though it violated judicial canon and it was an overt conflict of interest!  He is one of the few judges in the world who is caught acting outside of his jurisdiction allowing him to be sued personally!  Yet it is being fixed!

We got these bastards traitors red handed!  But they all seem to grab the red hand and coat themselves in the guilt!  Hey if they keep it off record, then no crime was committed!  See the recent case in Orange County that put elected sheriff Mike Carona in the Federal Penitentiary for 66 months for the same acts! http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/04/carona-sentence.html   

Yet they are going to make us out as mentally ill, vexatious litigants who just want to pick on poor government officials, and without public awareness, we are probably doomed! My credentials are at www.binarymarketing.com I do not deserve this treatment and is it contrary to my character!   I could drop this and allow them to continue unfettered with more abuse.  That is what they want!   According to some credible sources, we are not alone!  Eventually, this type of discrimination will be brought into perspective.  But Judges and magistrates and pro tem judges have absolute immunity even from corrupt acts, see Stump v. Sparkman.  They can commit any crime and not be civilly liable and the DOJ only prosecutes on very rare occasions.  Our system is so corrupt, and media allows this to occur without recording these events. 

You mentioned that you wanted to record this.  You should and I will aid in any way possible

SUPREME COURT CALLS OUT CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL AS CORRUPT ABUSIVE OFFICIAL!

Supreme Court News! January 21, 2010: Citizens United v. FEC, Opinion calls California Attorney General example of abusive official barring free speech due to accusations of unethical conduct of retaliating with abuse under cloak of law, when A.G. discovers who is opposed to him. CLICK Interestingly enough, news reports are very hard to find on this! Oh yes, we United States Citizens have a right to " FREE SPEECH without retaliation--"wink wink nod nod, say no more!" Eric Idle. Totalitarians are rolling on the floor laughing at us, while soldiers die defending rights hey do not have! Our politicians mix the blood of our soldiers in cocktails and have become drunk with abusive power! Crime Victims are the worst to suffer as the 9th circuit district courts ignore the California Victims Bill of Rights, which is another worthless document. United States has broken many treaties and the only one partially left is the United States Constitution. It is practically indiscernible.

3-8-10

Free Speech Barred in Eastern District Court: Citizens United v. FEC U.S. Supreme Court Free Speech case, Justice Thomas reveals last Month that California Citizens are under oppression from abusive Government, particularly, by the Attorney General of California, who is the example he uses in his stinging opinion: This isn't new To Pat Hamer, who caught local and state regional representatives engaging in wire and mail fraud, also implicated was Superior Court Judge, James Wagoner, who was admonished [slap on wrist] by www.cjp.ca.gov for what appears to be serious felony obstruction of justice.  Frankly, we are surprised they admonished him at this point says Hamer.  Perhaps they didn't get the memo in time, he chuckles.  Official Documents of this judges troubles are in an undisclosed safe deposit box along with original mail and wire fraud documents intercepted by a now regretful Republican political party committee member who didn’t know the can of worms he opened. In his last email, he stated, “this could ruin my career, “regarding his position in the Republican Party Committee.” 

Justice Thomas is about 4 years late on his discovery, Hamer is suing Cal. A.G. for not enforcing Cal.Civ.Code.P. 53.2, but according to Supreme Court Justice Thomas, who was a teenager, when he couldn’t set on the front of the buss, Amici, reveals, it isn’t going to happen under Edmund G. Brown Jr.  Thankfully, the cjp, though subtle, and the Supreme Court have not acquiesced to ratify local government criminal enterprise that Hamer uncovered.  The RICO act 18 U.S.C. 1961-1968, isn’t real complicated, and all the elements have been met.  Hamer v. El Dorado County et. al. is attempting to force the Federal Government to hold accountable these political thugs who have no respect for human rights and the U.S. Constitution.  Frankly, we are still lucky to be in the U.S. because these officials being sued, if they were in a totally oppressive totalitarian regime, they would be in irons in some dungeon, instead of exercising a hollow right to complain to the federal courts at a $50,000.00 per citizen expense' if you want to pay for your civil rights you thought were free!  Unbelievable but true, at this point the smiles on Hamer’s face are an attempt to be positive!

However, Hamer reports that you don’t get what they advertise.  A U.S. Magistrate, sort of an administration, non Article III Judge illegally took control of the case, and violated 18 U.S.C. 636(c)(3) by failing to inform Hamer of his right to a real Judge.  This law is sort of a civil rights Miranda.  So now we get an Automatic Appeal to try to Bar this Magistrate from continual frustrating of their complaint.  It appears that this Magistrate, a former Prosecutor, does not take too kindly to private citizens, holding his colleagues to the law!  Court records reveal that similar citizen allegations up and down this district are funneled specifically to Magistrate Brennan. It seems he’s been assigned damage control duty to stigmatize civil right Plaintiffs as “off their rocker” black helicopter conspiracy theorist vexatious litigants.

One Plaintiff under Brennan’s personal Jurisdiction, John O’Sullivan, has been murdered by an ex sheriff.  John, an ex. fellow Irish lad, met his demise while under scrutiny of courts and law enforcement in a neighbor property dispute.  Because what originated in Hamer’s original complaint to local seemingly inbred officials, was a neighbor dispute, too convoluted to discuss all details.  Nevertheless, it is the catalyst, but what the officials did to the Hamer’s overshadows the vandalism; because $5000 is nothing when you suddenly realize that you have no rights as a free private citizen.  This should not happen under the California and Federal Constitution in the 21, century.  U.S. citizens remain passive of this  political arena of overt corruption that has bled our country into bankruptcy.  Until they start objecting to the tolerance of courts forgiving corruption, our country is doomed to a spiral out of control sudden splash! Checks and balance are a fairytale believed by little children.  This is not supposed to happen in the U.S.A. 

Though the original vandalism cost $5000 dollars in damages, cronyism or political racketeering, came into play, which presented the greater damages to the Hamer’s.  This element frustrated the due process and this offended Hamer who started the redress process under the First Amendment at his own expense, an effort to make a better community.  This all happened when Prop 9 passed.  A Crime Victim Bill of Rights, a mere annoyance for officials who protect their own, under abusive authority, not an implausible premise.  It turned out that around 20 other citizens already had to be protected by 5 separate restraining orders, signed by Judges who possibly were not aware of the “illegal county policy”  [Hamer’s Law Suit],  or they were actually honest.  Nevertheless, judges signed the orders, but they were hollow and had no effect.  Notwithstanding, under the newly elected D.A. Pierson, stopped enforcing witness tampering crimes and assaults, stalking, vandalism, murder threats.  They were going out of their way to protect their mentally ill, out of control 2nd amendment poster Child David D. Randall a then criminal defendant on a ¼ million dollar bond.  This guy has a get out of Jail free card from El Dorado County.  He is their enforcer, along with his Neighbor Bob Anderson, a former county employee, who’s failed attempts to induce false testimony, and witness intimidation were allowed immunity from prosecution, and officials would not accept citizen complaints. 

Sheriff Neves and D.A. Vern Pierson refused to arrest witnesses and crime victims who were denied state constitution Article 28 protection.  The county violated their due process equal protection rights as “class of one” citizens protected under S. CT. Enquist v. Oregon classification for equal protection.”  Protecting crime victims outside of local law enforcement is a bizarre slippery slope that El Dorado County Board of Supervisors are willing to expend hundreds of thousands of citizen tax dollars annually to silence critics who object to overt state law violations, according to a group who is remaining anonymous to avoid the retaliation the Hamer’s are suffering.  Even though the Hamer’s  did nothing wrong, the have been cast in “disfavored citizens,” a violation of the Constitution, when it originates from “vindictive personal animus.”  Criminals face less punitive force than persons engaging in civil right disputes with local officials. That is where “money is no object” in covering up allegations.  It doesn’t take a kinder garden teacher to know that crime victims complaints to enforce the affidavit accusations of these private actors seeking protection is an unreasonable request!  Other witnesses in similar situation receive constitutional protection.  What is evident is that these victims and witnesses are being denied these rights out into the open.  This is suggestive that they know something that ticked off officials, when these victims engaged in whistle blowing.  For instance, Dave Randall has threatened to murder his accusers numerous times while on restraining orders were in affect.  Yet the Sheriff Neves and D.A. Vern Pierson said “so what.”   Ultimately, John O’Sullivan could sympathize if he wasn’t murdered  by his stalker.  Ironically the coroner didn’t refuse his wives call to pick up her husbands body, and he worked for the same sheriff department that turned a blind eye to an explosive condition such as that.  What a contrasting disgusting game of shame played out by smug terse officials with sociopath traits who control our local government.  After all it does take a “special person” to be in politics.  Read Dr. Robert Hare, P.hd, Psychopaths in suits, it will offer an explanation.

So, John O’Sullivan’s  Federal case is under the watchful eye of Justice Brennan, who has openly displayed a “blind eye” while coincidently the same self serving magistrate that is violating statute at the expense of Hamer’s civil rights, and possibly his life, because he violated another statute and rendered a Judgment on an injunction to force county officials to stop ongoing stalking and murder threats that allows these crimes to continue.  Now who do the Hamer’s complain to?  The next step may be political asylum somewhere.  Hamer is looking for suggestions at this point.  At least in other country’s free speech is not a trap to snare political opponents stomping out their speech totally using the Federal Courts to do it.  Free speech is hollow Justice Thomas on January 21, 2010 from his bench at the United States Supreme Court warned Californians to keep quite or face retaliation, four years to late for the Hamer’s who will play it out to the last breath, because living the U.S.A. knowing what they know is not possible when the American Dream is stolen from individual person’s by corrupt officials who have irradiated checks and balances efficient enough to make redress worthwhile.

The murder of John O’Sullivan has the Hamer’s concerned, but you just have to keep a positive attitude and a stiff upper lip.  Hamer born and raised in the U.K. a dual citizen, was shocked, and that is probably why he fights so hard.  Having been taught how great U.S.A. was supposed to be, an example for the rest of the world.  This perspective has been shattered by a few lowly officials and the Federal Courts are willing to take on that stain, believing the Hamer’s will be stigmatized as radical wing nuts by society.    

Helen Baumann and other El Dorado County Supervisors, are busy making big real estate deals, and getting wine industry laws passed to increase their own profits, while supervision of Law enforcement officials is an unknown concept.  Newly elected D.A. Vern Pierson was implicated by a mentally ill criminal defendant, his predecessor, Gary Lacy prosecuted, was out on ¼ million dollar bail, because E.D.C. Mental Health department and sheriff’s department policy was not enforcing state and federal laws removing guns from mental patients.  Or even recent new reports when baby Andrew Bailey’s chance of survival was diminished when EDSO failed to obey federal law Amber alert.  Ooops!    Elected sheriff Jeff Neves, defendant in the federal suit ratified a policy to deprive the rights of whistle blowers.  He and State in collusion with Assemblyman Ted Gaines deters whistle blowing with Police Raids of 8 to 10 armed officers to intimidate and silence “the dummies” in his county who actually thought the U.S. Constitution was real.  Jeff Neves, ratifying these raids against constituents reporting “politicians gone bad,” has since stepped down, confirming his demeanor as a unreliable public servant, though that is a good thing.  His co-defender formerly under-sheriff Fred Kollar, stepped in as top dog.  Fred Kollar was implicated in a document intercepted by Senator Dave Cox office, sent by co-defendant Brenda Bailey, under the “direction of Board of Supervisor Helen Baumann, also co-conspirator.  They threw Kollar, under the buss, so to speak, casting him as possible #2 RICO enterprise Boss of Republican Party enforcer, who use their official positions under the false color of official right to oppress and bar county citizens free speech, similar to cold war KGB 50 years ago. 

How Upset s Hamer you ask?  Though being a victim of corruption and finding that Magistrate Brennan counterfeiting Hamer’s complaint into unfamiliar fundamentally misconstrued allegations is frustrating.  He took Hamer’s complaint an rewrote the allegations into a cause of action that the Hamer’s did not allege, nor is it on the complaint!  “Though at times, it is intimidating, these latest exhibitions are hilarious, being part Brit growing up with the Monty Python series, it is a comedy of errors and open corruption makes good comedy, if your not the victim that is, wink wink nod nod, say no more ey mate!” Hamer states,  “in his opinion, this Magistrate is committing fraud by making up his own allegations and passing them off as ours, without even asking permission.  He has denied a hearing request brought by defense.  There main purpose seems to be obstruction of justice efforts to keep incriminating evidence off the record, and then they and every one else assume they are not criminals.  Nevertheless, a court hearing that could have cleared up any questions they wanted to ask.  See how it works?  Without testimony, they commit no crimes.  A hearing could have given them a basis to at least defend themselves against accusations of denying fair and impartial hearings.  But beyond the Federal Courts, no one else is there to hear!  So it is scary to know that officials all the way up to the federal court’s are basically lying crooks.  The magistrate confesses that the Pro Se pleadings are hard to comprehend, plausible deniability, but it’s a ruse.  Hamer a two time college Honor Graduate, and member of an honor fraternity who recruited him from college transcripts, has learned communication at least at the High School level for plead writing.  He states, “if you can read this, you can read the complaint.”  The shoe fits the violations occurred, the facts supported, their oppression suggests it, and there is no First Amendment no more, at least not for the Hamer’s who are disfavored citizens for speaking out for the good of the community!    

Hamer believes the magistrate did him  a favor, when he violated 18 USC § 636(c)(3).  The case can now goes to the appellate courts, where more officials have to make a choice to ratify overt criminal obstruction of justice or answer the allegations under the authority of the U.S. constitution made subject to the discretion of several thousand Judges, who if they choose to act corrupt or self serving are protected by the 11th amendment from corrupt acts they commit.   

The Attorney General who U.S. Supreme Court J. Thomas accuses as a political jack booted thug intimidating free speech efforts of Political opponents in not intimidated in the least.  He has acquiesced to it and is vehemently defending Ted Gaines and Judge James Wagoner to insure they have a constitutional right to obstruct justice against pesky citizens who attempt to defend themselves against the theft of property rights under the constitution.  This is a profit motive corruption ring in California, exposed by Justice Thomas, Bless his heart!  God save us!

U.S. citizens do not have a right to be protected from murder or violence.  The United States Supreme Court stated, “restraining orders are not for the purposes of RESTRAINING.”  U.S. Supreme Court 2005 Gonzales v. Castle Rock.

Public Officials have a constitutional right to be protected from the consequences of their own acts of corruption.  They stated, the law will not tolerate an action to redress the individual wrong which may have been done.'' U.S. Supreme Court 1997 Bogan v. Scott Harris.

Ironically the Supreme court will "tolerate" "murder" of it's citizens. This is a country of Checks and balances! Okay?

IS TOM MCCLINTOCK RATIFYING REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION IN HIS DISTRICT? DOES HIS 2ND AMENDMENT SUPPORT ARMING MENTALLY ILL OUTPATIENTS? THEN WHY IS HE RATIFYING THIS TYPE OF FEDERAL LAW VIOLATION CLICK HERE

I as a U.S. citizen have been barred the First, Fourteenth, and property right amendments because I engaged in whistle blowing. I along with others witnessed obstruction of justice perpetrated by a county of elected officials, who ratified each others malice. So Far a Judge has been admonished by the www.cjp.ca.gov for his role. Also the elected sheriff has stepped down. Also a Board of Supervisor has been barred from a legislature bid when her political party caught her committing wire fraud. She was later arrested on other matters.

The point is, even though certain agencies that refused to acquiesce to unlawful policy, or they didn’t get the “memo” instructing them to violate laws, such as 18 USC 1346 to deprive us of rights by breaking laws, those I accuse happen to have a disgusting privilege of MAFIA type “code of silence.” These are elected officials ratified the acts of local districts unlawful policy by inaction. These overt conspirator officials choose to make …

… “a deliberate choice to follow a course of action . . . made from among various alternatives by the official or officials responsible for establishing final policy with respect to the subject matter in question.' " Oviatt , 954 F.2d at 1477 (quoting Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S.

This example of cronyism, is filled with Mock Trials, public safety issues and “class of one” [see Willowbrook v. Olec US] discrimination that are unconstitutional acts. Yet nothing can be done, even at the Federal Court level, as I am finding out Hamer V. El Dorado County et al Sacramento Eastern District Court filed September 25 2008.

I am looking to collaborate with a sociologist regarding these incidences here in this county. El Dorado County is a rural community of white rich republicans who work in Sacramento. There is a basis for the claim that they discriminate against poor ethnic people and poor Caucasian people. I have a list of stories that fly in the face of precedence in the form of public information showing discrimination, mainly against poor ethnic people, poor non ethnic, and including failed hate crime allegations in their Superior courts.

I think because California is very liberal, this county is a strong hold reminiscent of 60’s type bigotry that still exists in the political forum. It makes an excellent petri dish small enough to simplify a study. Even though they have a few Hispanic officials in the city counsel, my claim is that the county openly commits Human Rights Abuse. I don’t like the term civil rights, because there is a stigma that is left out when compared to the phrase Human Rights. The Europeans have recognized this and use this term. Our own government “discriminates” with the classification of its own citizens when it condemns other nations, but then uses the proper term “Human Right Abuse.” For instance, Title 42 section 1981 and 1982 clearly state, “all citizens are entitled to be treated the same as white citizens.” Our Federal law seems to be equating “white citizens” as a benchmark for all other citizens to acquiesce to, and this law was reviewed in 2008 without public outcry. Even though our government has insulated themselves from civil action and indictment [11th amendment] for their own human rights abuse, they call them “civil rights [mere excusable] abuse” to which they are constitutionally protected to abuse “civil rights.” Where is the common sense? This is insane! There has never been a precedent to challenge immunity for “human right” violations, at least not in the United States. Apparently officials have discovered that they can incite a society to condemn Human Right Abuse if perpetrated by another country on their hit list, but then insulate their own hypocrisy by associating the terms in a way that removes the inhumanity of their abuse, by lowering their acts to “mere civil rights violations” even barring the word abuse from the more accurate term. Our government rule of law requires a “rational basis theory” in order to bar constitutional rights against civil citizens, not identified as Humans, perhaps in defense you could claim, “to not overstate the obvious?” Nevertheless, we need to determine if there is some sublime influence. As you know, German citizens barred Sovereign Immunity that insulates officials from Human Rights abuse. The intent being to remove Hitler, not when Hitler commits genocide but when Hitler was telling the world, his abuse would be mandated. Mandating abuse is what immunity is allowing as a constitutionally protected right shared by government officials. So in other words, we will tolerate Hitler types in our government until they acquiesce to Genocide? What the United States Government clings to is Sovereign Immunity. Evidence reveals that Immunity is actually in violation of the Authors intent for our judicial system. He authored Article III of the Judicial Powers act in the U.S. Constitution, and backed by that same author who clarified the intent in a Supreme Court Decision in 1789. Our government, which most U.S. “Citizens would argue, is the most free nation in the world, and they will die in the front lines of battle to get this point across. But our government does not associate civil rights as human rights! Other countries are taking the more compassionate approach, interjected with empathy for Human Rights. In other words, it is more palatable for an abusive official to abuse civil rights than to bear the conscious deliberate choices made to abuse HUMAN RIGHTS.

I understand that professors are looking for answers to better society. My claim, in this round about way, is that officials today are smug with power and abuse it quite often. The modern day civil right movement is being revealed to you in this document. My claim concerns a person’s right to be protected from “private violence” and “madmen.” Let me restate that, “Antonin Scalia and the other justices in the Supreme court have stated that United States citizens have “no constitutional right to be protected from private violence or madmen.” Gonzales v. Castle Rock U.S. 2005. Furthermore, and in a selfish contrary arbitrary fashion, they have stated “When Corrupt, the Supreme Court will not tolerate citizens who file lawsuits against officials to redress their grievances.” [Slightly paraphrased.] Bogan v. Scott Harris U.S. 1997 They claim that corrupt officials will be indicted. That is just not true and subject to biased unconstitutional discretion of jurisdictions that are engaging the hands off approach to policing themselves. See Orange County and the sentencing to prison Elected sheriff Mike Carona to federal prison. See 18 US 1346 violations sending many officials to prison, but isolated to jurisdictions not influenced by local corruption. Two governors are in prison under those violations.

So, the Supreme Court is advertising that Private Violence is not the responsibility of our Law enforcement. Now law enforcement's agencies across the U.S. have removed, “To protect and serve” from their squad cars” so they can’t be sued for false advertising or breach of a fiduciary duty that now does not exist. We are seeing this display of private violence in the form of Columbine, Virginia Tech, Fort Hood, Alabama, Texas IRS, now Colorado shooting. All of these incidences had previous warning signs that restraining orders could have cured by allowing official intervention to prevent murder. Yet the Gonzales case was the case that finally said, “restraining orders are not for the purpose of restraining.” El Dorado County has mixed this dangerous cocktail openly and is blind drunk with power and smug abuse of those who ask for help, when they have a political interest to protect their own.

If there is any professor or student looking for a sociology dilemma that needs addressing, this is it, and El Dorado County and District 4 officials are examples of government who blatantly bar the public participation of citizens who attempt to improve public safety. This is unconstitutional, even in California! My personal case shows officials engaging in unbelievable unconscionable acts. In all my redress attempts, excluding the few success I mention, the basis for their argument is ad hominem abusive, because that is their only defense they have thus far been able to perform. Ad hominem abusive controls the courts in Eastern District court under the Magistrate Edmund Brennan. This is now public record.