Supreme Court News! January 21, 2010: Citizens United v. FEC, Opinion calls California Attorney General example of abusive official barring free speech due to accusations of unethical conduct of retaliating with abuse under cloak of law, when A.G. discovers who is opposed to him. CLICK Interestingly enough, news reports are very hard to find on this! Oh yes, we United States Citizens have a right to " FREE SPEECH without retaliation--"wink wink nod nod, say no more!" Eric Idle. Totalitarians are rolling on the floor laughing at us, while soldiers die defending rights hey do not have! Our politicians mix the blood of our soldiers in cocktails and have become drunk with abusive power! Crime Victims are the worst to suffer as the 9th circuit district courts ignore the California Victims Bill of Rights, which is another worthless document. United States has broken many treaties and the only one partially left is the United States Constitution. It is practically indiscernible.

3-8-10

Free Speech Barred in Eastern District Court: Citizens United v. FEC U.S. Supreme Court Free Speech case, Justice Thomas reveals last Month that California Citizens are under oppression from abusive Government, particularly, by the Attorney General of California, who is the example he uses in his stinging opinion: This isn't new To Pat Hamer, who caught local and state regional representatives engaging in wire and mail fraud, also impllicatted was Superior Court Judge, James Wagoner, who was admonished [slap on wrist] by www.cjp.ca.gov for what appears to be serious felony obstruction of justice.  Frankly, we are surprised they admonished him at this point says Hamer.  Perhaps they didn’t get the memo in time, he chuckles.  Official Documents of this judges troubles are in an undisclosed safe deposit box along with original mail and wire fraud documents intercepted by a now regretful Republican political party committee member who didn’t know the can of worms he opened. In his last email, he stated, “this could ruin my career, “regarding his position in the Republican Party Committee.” 

Justice Thomas is about 4 years late on his discovery, Hamer is suing Cal. A.G. for not enforcing Cal.Civ.Code.P. 53.2, but according to Supreme Court Justice Thomas, who was a teenager, when he couldn’t set on the front of the buss, Amici, reveals, it isn’t going to happen under Edmund G. Brown Jr.  Thankfully, the cjp, though subtle, and the Supreme Court are apparently not part of the government criminal enterprise that Hamer uncovered.  RICO act 18 U.S.C. 1961-1968, isn’t real complicated, and all the elements have been met.  Hamer v. El Dorado County et. al. is attempting to force the Federal Government to hold accountable these political thugs who have no respect for human rights and the U.S. Constitution.  Frankly, we are still lucky to be in the U.S. because these officials being sued, if they were in a totally oppressive regime, the body count would be the result, instead of a hollow right to complain to the federal courts at a $50,000.00 per citizen expense if you want to buy those civil rights you thought were free!  Unbelievable but true, at this point the smiles on Hamer’s face are an attempt to be positive!

However, Hamer reports that you don’t get what they advertise.  A U.S. Magistrate, sort of an administration, non Article III Judge illegally took control of the case, and violated 18 U.S.C. 636(c)(3) by failing to inform Hamer of his right to a real Judge.  This law is sort of a civil rights Miranda.  So now we get an Automatic Appeal to try to Bar this Magistrate from continual frustrating of their complaint.  It appears that this Magistrate, a former Prosecutor, does not take too kindly to private citizens, holding his colleagues to the law!  Court records reveal that similar citizen allegations up and down this district are funneled specifically to Magistrate Brennan. It seems he’s been assigned damage control duty to stigmatize civil right Plaintiffs as “off their rocker” black helicopter conspiracy theorist vexatious litigants.

One Plaintiff under Brennan’s personal Jurisdiction, John O’Sullivan, has been murdered by an ex sheriff.  John, an ex. fellow Irish lad, met his demise while under scrutiny of courts and law enforcement in a neighbor property dispute.  Because what originated in Hamer’s original complaint to local seemingly inbred officials, was a neighbor dispute, too convoluted to discuss all details.  Nevertheless, it is the catalyst, but what the officials did to the Hamer’s overshadows the vandalism; because $5000 is nothing when you suddenly realize that you have no rights as a free private citizen.  This should not happen under the California and Federal Constitution in the 21, century.  U.S. citizens remain passive of this  political arena of overt corruption that has bled our country into bankruptcy.  Until they start objecting to the tolerance of courts forgiving corruption, our country is doomed to a spiral out of control sudden splash! Checks and balance are a fairytale believed by little children.  This is not supposed to happen in the U.S.A. 

Though the original vandalism cost $5000 dollars in damages, cronyism or political racketeering, came into play, which presented the greater damages to the Hamer’s.  This element frustrated the due process and this offended Hamer who started the redress process under the First Amendment at his own expense, an effort to make a better community.  This all happened when Prop 9 passed.  A Crime Victim Bill of Rights, a mere annoyance for officials who protect their own, under abusive authority, not an implausible premise.  It turned out that around 20 other citizens already had to be protected by 5 separate restraining orders, signed by Judges who possibly were not aware of the “illegal county policy”  [Hamer’s Law Suit],  or they were actually honest.  Nevertheless, judges signed the orders, but they were hollow and had no effect.  Notwithstanding, under the newly elected D.A. Pierson, stopped enforcing witness tampering crimes and assaults, stalking, vandalism, murder threats.  They were going out of their way to protect their mentally ill, out of control 2nd amendment poster Child David D. Randall a then criminal defendant on a ¼ million dollar bond.  This guy has a get out of Jail free card from El Dorado County.  He is their enforcer, along with his Neighbor Bob Anderson, a former county employee, who’s failed attempts to induce false testimony, and witness intimidation were allowed immunity from prosecution, and officials would not accept citizen complaints. 

Sheriff Neves and D.A. Vern Pierson refused to arrest witnesses and crime victims who were denied state constitution Article 28 protection.  The county violated their due process equal protection rights as “class of one” citizens protected under S.CT. Enquist v. Oregan classification for equal protection.”  Protecting crime victims outside of local law enforcement is a bizarre slippery slope that El Dorado County Board of Supervisors are willing to expend hundreds of thousands of citizen tax dollars annually to silence critics who object to overt state law violations, according to a group who is remaining anonymous to avoid the retaliation the Hamer’s are suffering.  Even though the Hamer’s  did nothing wrong, the have been cast in “disfavored citizens,” a violation of the Constitution, when it originates from “vindictive personal animu.”  Criminals face less punitive force than persons engaging in civil right disputes with local officials. That is where “money is no object” in covering up allegations.  It doesn’t take a kinder garden teacher to know that crime victims complaints to enforce the affidavit accusations of these private actors seeking protection is an unreasonable request!  Other witnesses in similar situation receive constitutional protection.  What is evident is that these victims and witnesses are being denied these rights out int the open.  This is suggestive that they know something that ticked off officials, when these victims engaged in whistle blowing.  For instance, Dave Randall has threatened to murder his accusers numerous times while on restraining orders were in affect.  Yet the Sheriff Neves and D.A. Vern Pierson said “so what.”   Ultimately, John O’Sullivan could sympathize if he wasn’t murdered  by his stalker.  Ironically the coroner didn’t refuse his wives call to pick up her husbands body, and he worked for the same sheriff department that turned a blind eye to an explosive condition such as that.  What a contrasting disgusting game of shame played out by smug terse officials with sociopathic traits who control our local government.  After all it does take a “special person” to be in politics.  Read Dr. Robert Hare, P.hd, Psychopaths in suits, it will offer an explanation.

So, John O’Sullivan’s  Federal case is under the watchful eye of Justice Brennan, who has openly displayed a “blind eye” while coincidently the same self serving magistrate that is violating statute at the expense of Hamer’s civil rights, and possibly his life, because he violated another statute and rendered a Judgment on an injunction to force county officials to stop ongoing stalking and murder threats that allows these crimes to continue.  Now who do the Hamer’s complain to?  The next step may be political asylum somewhere.  Hamer is looking for suggestions at this point.  At least in other country’s free speech is not a trap to snare political opponents stomping out their speech totally using the Federal Courts to do it.  Free speech is hollow Justice Thomas on January 21, 2010 from his bench at the United States Supreme Court warned Californians to keep quite or face retaliation, four years to late for the Hamer’s who will play it out to the last breath, because living the U.S.A. knowing what they know is not possible when the American Dream is stolen from individual person’s by corrupt officials who have irradiated checks and balances efficient enough to make redress worthwhile.

The murder of John O’Sullivan has the Hamer’s concerned, but you just have to keep a positive attitude and a stiff upper lip.  Hamer born and raised in the U.K. a dual citizen, was shocked, and that is probably why he fights so hard.  Having been taught how great U.S.A. was supposed to be, an example for the rest of the world.  This perspective has been shattered by a few lowly officials and the Federal Courts are willing to take on that stain, believing the Hamer’s will be stigmatized as radical wing nuts by society.    

Helen Baumann and other El Dorado County Supervisors, are busy making big real estate deals, and getting wine industry laws passed to increase their own profits, while supervision of Law enforcement officials is an unknown concept.  Newly elected D.A. Vern Pierson was implicated by a mentally ill criminal defendant, his predecessor, Gary Lacy prosecuted, was out on ¼ million dollar bail, because E.D.C. Mental Health department and sheriff’s department policy was not enforcing state and federal laws removing guns from mental patients.  Or even recent new reports when baby Andrew Bailey’s chance of survival was diminished when EDSO failed to obey federal law Amber alert.  Ooops!    Elected sheriff Jeff Neves, defendant in the federal suit ratified a policy to deprive the rights of whistle blowers.  He and State in collusion with Assemblyman Ted Gaines deters whistleblowing with Police Raids of 8 to 10 armed officers to intimidate and silence “the dummies” in his county who actually thought the U.S. Constitution was real.  Jeff Neves, ratifying these raids against constituents reporting “politicians gone bad,” has since stepped down, confirming his demeanor as a unreliable public servant, though that is a good thing.  His co-defender formerly under-sheriff Fred Kollar, stepped in as top dog.  Fred Kollar was implicated in a document intercepted by Senator Dave Cox office, sent by co-defendant Brenda Bailey, under the “direction of Board of Supervisor Helen Baumann, also co-conspirator.  They threw Kollar, under the buss, so to speak, casting him as possible #2 RICO enterprise Boss of Republican Party enforcer, who use their official positions under the false color of official right to oppress and bar county citizens free speech, similar to cold war KGB 50 years ago. 

How Upset s Hamer you ask?  Though being a victim of corruption and finding that Magistrate Brennan counterfeiting Hamer’s complaint into unfamiliar fundamentally misconstrued allegations is frustrating.  He took Hamer’s complaint an rewrote the allegations into a cause of action that the Hamer’s did not allege, nor is it on the complaint!  “Though at times, it is intimidating, these latest exhibitions are hilarious, being part Brit growing up with the Monty Python series, it is a comedy of errors and open corruption makes good comedy, if your not the victim that is, wink wink nod nod, say no more ey mate!” Hamer states,  “in his opinion, this Magistrate is committing fraud by making up his own allegations and passing them off as ours, without even asking permission.  He has denied a hearing request brought by defense.  There main purpose seems to be obstruction of justice efforts to keep incriminating evidence off the record, and then they and every one else assume they are not criminals.  Nevertheless, a court hearing that could have cleared up any questions they wanted to ask.  See how it works?  Without testimony, they commit no crimes.  A hearing could have given them a basis to at least defend themselves against accusations of denying fair and impartial hearings.  But beyond the Federal Courts, no one else is there to hear!  So it is scary to know that officials all the way up to the federal court’s are basically lying crooks.  The magistrate confesses that the Pro Se pleadings are hard to comprehend, plausible deniability, but it’s a ruse.  Hamer a two time college Honor Graduate, and member of an honor fraternity who recruited him from college transcripts, has learned communication at least at the High School level for plead writing.  He states, “if you can read this, you can read the complaint.”  The shoe fits the violations occurred, the facts supported, their oppression suggests it, and there is no First Amendment no more, at least not for the Hamer’s who are disfavored citizens for speaking out for the good of the community!    

Hamer believes the magistrate did him  a favor, when he violated 18 USC § 636(c)(3).  The case can now goes to the appellate courts, where more officials have to make a choice to ratify overt criminal obstruction of justice or answer the allegations under the authority of the U.S. constitution made subject to the discretion of several thousand Judges, who if they choose to act corrupt or self serving are protected by the 11th amendment from corrupt acts they commit.   

The Attorney General who U.S. Supreme Court J. Thomas accuses as a political jack booted thug intimidating free speech efforts of Political opponents in not intimidated in the least.  He has acquiesced to it and is vehemently defending Ted Gaines and Judge James Wagoner to insure they have a constitutional right to obstruct justice against pesky citizens who attempt to defend themselves against the theft of property rights under the constitution.  This is a profit motive corruption ring in California, exposed by Justice Thomas, Bless his heart!  God save us!